background
 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

 

  QUICK LINKS

  Contact Us

  Contact Legislature

  Events

dog  Gary Randall

  Foundation

  Library

  Lobby

  Press Releases

  Volunteer Network

 

  RESOURCES

  2009 Elway Poll regarding same-sex marriage in Washington

  Pastor's Free Speech Rights

  Website Resources - Banners, etc.

Faith & Freedom Network Blog: US Supreme Court to Conference on R-71 Names

Wednesday, December 09, 2009

US Supreme Court to Conference on R-71 Names

Our attorney, James Bopp, Jr., notified us yesterday that the State of Washington has filed their Brief in Opposition to sealing the names of those who signed R-71 petitions.

The State continues to demand the names be released to the public over our objections that there are those who wish to harass and do harm to those who signed.

James told me the case will be conferenced by the Supreme Court on Friday, January 8. We will hear if it is granted on the 8th or the 11th.

We will keep you updated.

I have linked a copy the State's Brief in Opposition.

Thank you for your support.

_______________
Gary Randall
President
Faith & Freedom

Click here to add these blogs to your email inbox.

Share
Bookmark and Share
posted by Gary Randall @ 12:53 PM   2 comments

2 Comments:

At 11:29 AM, December 13, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone fill me in on this ? I understand the concern of being intimidated , in fact even possibly harassed or worse. Also I don't think names on petitions should be given out or made to be public , just like voting should not be. I can just see solicitors getting the list of names also.

But if the law dictated that names were open to the public going into the petition , what is the basis for the with holding of names ?

Mick

 
At 1:55 PM, December 22, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yea, I too get the concerns over harassment. The thing is, Washington tries to have a transparent government. Though our votes are private, our elected officials' votes on legislative items are not. Already the initiative process has tons of weak spots. We don�t need to contribute to it by stripping away all transparencies.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home